Sunak enjoys his flights

Prime Minister Sunak is regularly criticised for choosing the most polluting form of transport – preferring to fly by private jet and helicopter, rather than taking the train, even for quite short journeys. At a time when the climate emergency is becoming increasingly severe, he acts as though he’s above all this, sees himself as some sort of rockstar or jet-setter.

According to the Guardian newspaper:

“The high-carbon travel habits of government ministers have led to doubts about their sincerity when talking about their commitment to protecting the environment. But this government, in rushing to put party before planet and people, is the first to make their environmental U-turns the main theme of their election campaign.

The prime minister has come under fire in the past for his private jet and helicopter habit. Though he says taking private aviation to travel short distances is a more efficient use of his time than using road or rail, many have pointed out the climate – and cost – impacts of his preferred travel methods.

Recent data from the Ministry of Justice showed that Rishi Sunak has used RAF jets and helicopters for domestic flights more frequently than the UK’s previous three prime ministers. The data revealed he took almost one such flight a week during his first seven months in office. Some trips included one by helicopter to Dover, which would have taken just over an hour by train, and another helicopter ride to Southampton, which would come in at one hour 14 minutes by rail.”

Hierarchy of racism

Debates over Dianne Abbotts letter to the Observer newspaper and her subsequent sacking from labour party.

As far as I understand her letter, shes argues a hierachy of racism exists, yet cites example of prejudice against red headed men as a less serious prejudice than anti black racism. 

In my drawing I show a police stop and search of red headed men, an unlikely event, and would be surprising to see. An almost fantastical situation – surreal. It’s nearly always black males.

Based on my own childhood experience, prejudice against red headed men is severe, can be constant, and is serious abuse.

Shooting a racehorse

This is a small (A5) acrylic painting, on paper. It was made in response to a UK arts competition, and responding to events at the recent Aintree Grand National, where high dangerous fences regularly badly (often fatally) injure horses. The danger of the race course is what makes this race special, but the horses suffer.

In my painting two men take an injured prizewinning horse behind a screen, away from the public view, and shoot it. This was a quick painting with little detail, and I think it expresses the emotion and horror.

Horse experts argue medical technology isn’t advanced enough to save the horses if they suffer serious injuries, and they have no choice but to put the animal out of their misery.

This seems a brutal and harsh end of life for these beautiful intelligent animals, which have worked hard for their owners – and often generated huge sums of prize money.

Once they aren’t useful, they shoot them.

I grew up not far from there, and the Grand National was always a special event, and most people would place a bet. The animal welfare was never discussed or considered.

This is a big subject, and horrific. Further reading on the cruelty of horse racing:

https://plantbasednews.org/culture/ethics/horse-racing-cruel
https://www.peta.org.uk/blog/the-grand-national-9-things-they-dont-tell-you-about-horse-racing/
https://www.animalaid.org.uk/the-issues/our-campaigns/horse-racing/ban-the-grand-national/

It’s party time

Digital drawing, about a party. Maybe it’s a party that’s gone on too long, in the summer, and everyone’s had too much to drink.

I was thinking about expensive prestigious horse races and the fancy clothes that people wear at races.

But also the sort of people who go the races, the rich and the very rich, and the class aspects involved in this.

Going to the Races is a world I’ve never experienced first hand.

This is just quick a sketch, but it gives me ideas for areas of future exploration. Class seems to lie at the bottom of many of my art works, and is a subject I want to explore further.

Michelle Mone

Narrative composition, graphic novel style, summarising visually the Michelle Mone PPE scandal.

Who is Baroness Mone?

The 51-year-old is a businesswoman and the founder of lingerie company Ultimo.

Born in Glasgow, she left school with no qualifications at 15 and went on to launch ventures in diet pills, fake tan and cryptocurrency. She became a Conservative life peer in 2015.

What is the PPE controversy?

The row around PPE Medpro started back in 2020, when reporters first began asking questions about Baroness Mone’s apparent links to the company.

In 2021, the government revealed that she had referred PPE Medpro via the VIP lane system, with the company awarded two contracts worth £200m.

Last month, Lady Mone faced allegations that she had profited from the business, a claim she denies.

How did the PPE contract system work?

The VIP lane system saw a separate mailbox set up for MPs to send on offers from firms, but led to the government being criticised for giving preferential treatment to companies with political contacts.

What investigations are under way?

Lady Mone is currently under investigation by the House of Lords commissioner for standards, with parliament’s website saying the probe is over “alleged involvement in procuring contracts for PPE Medpro leading to potential breaches…of the House of Lords code of conduct”.

PPE Medpro has also become the subject of a potential fraud investigation by the National Crime Agency.

What does Baroness Mone say?

Baroness Mone has consistently denied any “role or function” in the company, with lawyers previously saying she is “not connected to PPE Medpro in any capacity”.

(From Sky News: https://news.sky.com/story/michelle-mone-who-is-she-and-what-is-the-ppe-controversy-swirling-around-the-tory-peer-12762756)

Londongrad

Graphical composition about Johnson and Lebedev, in the context of the Russian invasion of Ukraine.

Summarises and condenses the situation in a composition. An informed artwork that incorporates the news, opinions and emotions.

  • We are the London laundromat, where everyone dodgy across the world 
  • comes to launder their dirty money
  • Golden visas for the rich
  • Hostile environment for the poor
  • Londongrad
  • Wealthy Russians
  • Knightsbridge is one big playground
  • Spend a million in Harrods
  • Billionaire friends of the Tories
  • Personal friends of the PM
  • His parties were legendary
  • Now sitting in the house of Lords for services rendered
  • How unbelievable
  • Whatever were they thinking?
  • His dad was a KGB spy
  • But he’s not the same
  • He’s a good guy
  • Then where
  • Did his money come from?
  • To buy the Evening Standard?
  • Never read it.
  • Lavish parties
  • Johnson stoned out of his mind walked back down an Italian mountain
  • Security risk
  • We’re being lied to

No visas delivered in Paris

Refugees – UK response – Calais (April 2022)

UK visa response to Ukrainians “shameful”.

The Home Office turned away Ukrainian refugees escaping the war because they didn’t have the right paperwork.

A Ukrainian woman and her 8-year-old daughter slept rough for 4 days and nights in freezing temperatures to cross the Polish border, only to be refused entry to the UK at Calais. 

We cannot turn our back on those fleeing persecution in Ukraine. The UK must give an ambitious commitment to resettle Ukrainian refugees in the UK. 

In comparison with the rest of Europe the UK government is harsher on Ukrainian refugees but softer on Russian oligarchs.

They dont want to let them in. They pretend we are doing more than everyone else, and lie about it.

For the Tories, demonising foreign “others” has long been a convenient means of diverting working-class anger at economic insecurity away from powerful interests. They have always demonised and scapegoated migrants and refugees. The last thing these people want is more refugees, they think the UK “can’t afford” them and it should “look after its own first”.